Talk:Autonomous colony - Revision history

Spriditis: Undo revision 5556 by 212.45.98.137 (Talk) removing garbage

2011-05-22T08:33:29Z

Undo revision 5556 by 212.45.98.137 (Talk) removing garbage

212.45.98.137: /* lIcJdhIUXDiKG */ new section

2011-05-22T08:25:50Z

lIcJdhIUXDiKG: new section

Rfc at 06:25, 26 June 2008

2008-06-26T06:25:40Z

Strangelv: /* New Name */

2008-06-25T09:48:08Z

New Name

Rfc: /* New Name */

2008-06-24T13:18:41Z

New Name

Strangelv: ...and why a method that completely erased its development history?

2008-06-24T02:37:31Z

...and why a method that completely erased its development history?

Strangelv: Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured?

2008-06-24T02:35:54Z

Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured?

New page

==New Name==
Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? -- [[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:33, 22 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I'd prefer the Wikipedia rule, for I do not see the advantage in capitalization in the article's name. Capitalization can still be used for the bold part within the introduction, usually repeating the name of the article. Anyway, I'll do the move operation not before an other article is featured. Thanks for your hints:-) -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 06:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)		:I'd prefer the Wikipedia rule, for I do not see the advantage in capitalization in the article's name. Capitalization can still be used for the bold part within the introduction, usually repeating the name of the article. Anyway, I'll do the move operation not before an other article is featured. Thanks for your hints:-) -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 06:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
−
−	~~== lIcJdhIUXDiKG ==~~
−
−	~~No more s***. All posts of this qaultiy from now on~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:25, 22 May 2011
Line 5:		Line 5:

	:I'd prefer the Wikipedia rule, for I do not see the advantage in capitalization in the article's name. Capitalization can still be used for the bold part within the introduction, usually repeating the name of the article. Anyway, I'll do the move operation not before an other article is featured. Thanks for your hints:-) -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 06:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)		:I'd prefer the Wikipedia rule, for I do not see the advantage in capitalization in the article's name. Capitalization can still be used for the bold part within the introduction, usually repeating the name of the article. Anyway, I'll do the move operation not before an other article is featured. Thanks for your hints:-) -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 06:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	== lIcJdhIUXDiKG ==
		+
		+	No more s***. All posts of this qaultiy from now on

← Older revision		Revision as of 06:25, 26 June 2008
Line 3:		Line 3:
	:Undone. I did it for unification purpose with the naming of [[Earth-supported colony]]. Are there any side effects, except the history? How else can we do it? -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:Undone. I did it for unification purpose with the naming of [[Earth-supported colony]]. Are there any side effects, except the history? How else can we do it? -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	::Thank you. Move is usually (but not always) adequate -- the history was at first copied over (which was actually better), but under newer versions obliterates the history from the original page, making it less useful (used to be able to use it to split an article with edit history intact for both articles). One question is what is the prevailing rule for capitalization here? On Lunarpedia, capitalization is usually done as a proper title -- all important words are capitalized -- in contrast to the Wikipedia rule, which is optimized for the convenience of making hyperlinks. I expect to be spending more time with exporting and reimporting pages to preserve edit histories... -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 09:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)		::Thank you. Move is usually (but not always) adequate -- the history was at first copied over (which was actually better), but under newer versions obliterates the history from the original page, making it less useful (used to be able to use it to split an article with edit history intact for both articles). One question is what is the prevailing rule for capitalization here? On Lunarpedia, capitalization is usually done as a proper title -- all important words are capitalized -- in contrast to the Wikipedia rule, which is optimized for the convenience of making hyperlinks. I expect to be spending more time with exporting and reimporting pages to preserve edit histories... -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 09:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)
		+
		+	:I'd prefer the Wikipedia rule, for I do not see the advantage in capitalization in the article's name. Capitalization can still be used for the bold part within the introduction, usually repeating the name of the article. Anyway, I'll do the move operation not before an other article is featured. Thanks for your hints:-) -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 06:25, 26 June 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:48, 25 June 2008
Line 2:		Line 2:
	Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? ...and why a method that completely erased its development history? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? ...and why a method that completely erased its development history? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
	:Undone. I did it for unification purpose with the naming of [[Earth-supported colony]]. Are there any side effects, except the history? How else can we do it? -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		:Undone. I did it for unification purpose with the naming of [[Earth-supported colony]]. Are there any side effects, except the history? How else can we do it? -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	::Thank you. Move is usually (but not always) adequate -- the history was at first copied over (which was actually better), but under newer versions obliterates the history from the original page, making it less useful (used to be able to use it to split an article with edit history intact for both articles). One question is what is the prevailing rule for capitalization here? On Lunarpedia, capitalization is usually done as a proper title -- all important words are capitalized -- in contrast to the Wikipedia rule, which is optimized for the convenience of making hyperlinks. I expect to be spending more time with exporting and reimporting pages to preserve edit histories... -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 09:48, 25 June 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 13:18, 24 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==New Name==		==New Name==
	Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? ...and why a method that completely erased its development history? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)		Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? ...and why a method that completely erased its development history? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)
		+	:Undone. I did it for unification purpose with the naming of [[Earth-supported colony]]. Are there any side effects, except the history? How else can we do it? -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 13:18, 24 June 2008 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 02:37, 24 June 2008
Line 1:		Line 1:
	==New Name==		==New Name==
−	Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)	+	Why are we renaming the featured article while it's still featured? ...and why a method that completely erased its development history? -- [[User:Strangelv\|Strangelv]] 02:35, 24 June 2008 (UTC)