Difference between revisions of "Nuclear thermal propulsion"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 74: Line 74:
 
===Types===
 
===Types===
  
*Solid core
+
*Solid core<ref>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19960001947.pdf</ref>
 
*Gas core<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/87734/585_1.pdf</ref>
 
*Gas core<ref>https://deepblue.lib.umich.edu/bitstream/handle/2027.42/87734/585_1.pdf</ref>
 
*Nuclear light bulb, open and closed<ref>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690014077.pdf</ref>
 
*Nuclear light bulb, open and closed<ref>https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19690014077.pdf</ref>

Revision as of 02:50, 27 July 2020

Nuclear thermal propulsion uses a nuclear core to heat a propellant and provide propulsion to a space vehicle.

Liquid hydrogen is usually used as the propellant as it has a higher velocity for the same input power, and therefore produces a faster final velocity according to the rocket equation.


History of nuclear thermal propulsion

American

Nerva[1]

Propellant Liquid hydrogen
Performance
Thrust (vac.) 246,663 N (55,452 lbf)
Chamber pressure 3,861 kPa (560.0 psi)
Isp (vac.) 841 seconds (8.25 km/s)
Isp (SL) 710 seconds (7.0 km/s)
Burn time 1,680 seconds
Thrust to weigh ratio 1.36
Restarts 24
Dimensions
Length 6.9 meters (23 ft)
Diameter 2.59 meters (8 ft 6 in)
Dry weight 18,144 kilograms (40,001 lb)

Russian

Analysis of use

Advantages

  • Higher ISP than chemical
  • Higher power energy source
  • Shorter travel time
  • Oberth effect
  • Self cooling

Disadvantages

  • Cost
  • Cost of development
  • Risk of accident
  • Lower ISP than electric
  • Low public trust
  • Thrust to weight ratio close to 1 (cannot take off from Earth with a significant payload)

Types

  • Solid core[2]
  • Gas core[3]
  • Nuclear light bulb, open and closed[4]
  • Nuclear salt water rockets[5]

References