Difference between revisions of "Radiation shielding"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 1: Line 1:
 
[[Image:WaterShieldGreenhouse.png|thumb|right|300px|Water-shield Greenhouse Concept]]  
 
[[Image:WaterShieldGreenhouse.png|thumb|right|300px|Water-shield Greenhouse Concept]]  
Shielding against [[radiation]] is considered a very difficult task. For example, a proton or alpha particle cosmic ray of "medium" energy can pass through more than a metre of aluminium, not counting the effects of [[secondary radiation]]<ref name=Logan>''Operational medicine and health care delivery'' - J.S. Logan, in S.E. Churchill ed. ''Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1'' - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 154-156.</ref>. With this in mind, it is clear that any Martian colonists would have to take a holistic approach, reducing their radiation exposure at every possible opportunity through shielding and risk-mitigating behaviour.
+
Shielding against [[radiation]] is considered a very difficult task. For example, a proton or alpha particle cosmic ray of "medium" energy can pass through more than a metre of aluminium, not counting the effects of [[secondary radiation]]<ref name="Logan">''Operational medicine and health care delivery'' - J.S. Logan, in S.E. Churchill ed. ''Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1'' - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 154-156.</ref>. With this in mind, it is clear that any Martian colonists would have to take a holistic approach, reducing their radiation exposure at every possible opportunity through shielding and risk-mitigating behaviour.
  
 
==Passive shielding==
 
==Passive shielding==
Line 6: Line 6:
 
In most cases, matter placed between a person (or radiation-sensitive equipment) and radiation source reduces the amount of radiation they absorb. The effectiveness of the shielding increases with the mass of the shielding and decreases with the atomic mass of the elements used for the shielding. For example, 1kg of [[hydrogen]] offers more protection then 1kg of [[aluminium]], 2kg of aluminium offers more protection than 1kg of aluminium and 1kg of hydrogen offers more protection than 2kg of aluminium.<ref>''Radiation biology'' - J.R. Letaw, in S.E. Churchill ed. ''Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1'' - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 16-17.</ref>
 
In most cases, matter placed between a person (or radiation-sensitive equipment) and radiation source reduces the amount of radiation they absorb. The effectiveness of the shielding increases with the mass of the shielding and decreases with the atomic mass of the elements used for the shielding. For example, 1kg of [[hydrogen]] offers more protection then 1kg of [[aluminium]], 2kg of aluminium offers more protection than 1kg of aluminium and 1kg of hydrogen offers more protection than 2kg of aluminium.<ref>''Radiation biology'' - J.R. Letaw, in S.E. Churchill ed. ''Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1'' - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 16-17.</ref>
  
[[Mars One]]'s solution is a thick layer of [[regolith]] on top of the settlement modules. An effective shield will require at least several hundred grams of regolith per square centimeter, according to one study.<ref>Slaba, T. C., Mertens, C. J., & Blattnig, S. R. (2013). Radiation Shielding Optimization on Mars. ''NASA/TP–2013-217983.'' Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130012456.pdf</ref>  Using a regolith density estimate of 1.4 g/cm<sup>3</sup><ref>Kim, M. Y., Thibeault, S. A., Simonsen, L. C., & Wilson, J. W. Comparison of Martian Meteorites and Martian Regolith as Shield Materials for Galactic Cosmic Rays. ''NASA TP-1998-208724.'' Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980237030.pdf.</ref>, this means the regolith layer would need to be over 2 meters deep.   
+
[[Mars One]]'s solution is a thick layer of [[regolith]] on top of the settlement modules. An effective shield will require at least several hundred grams of regolith per square centimeter, according to one study.<ref>Slaba, T. C., Mertens, C. J., & Blattnig, S. R. (2013). Radiation Shielding Optimization on Mars. ''NASA/TP–2013-217983.'' Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130012456.pdf</ref>  Using a regolith density estimate of 1.4 g/cm<sup>3</sup><ref>Kim, M. Y., Thibeault, S. A., Simonsen, L. C., & Wilson, J. W. Comparison of Martian Meteorites and Martian Regolith as Shield Materials for Galactic Cosmic Rays. ''NASA TP-1998-208724.'' Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980237030.pdf.</ref>, this means the regolith layer would need to be over 2 meters deep.  For concrete with an average density of 2.4 g/cm3 the required thickness might be less. 
 +
 
 +
The attenuation  of radiation follows the Beer Lamberth law.<ref>https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/attenuationCoef.htm</ref> 
 +
 
 +
I=I<sub>o</sub>*e<sup>-ux</sup> 
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|Where:
 +
|I
 +
|=
 +
|the intensity of photons transmitted across some distance x
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|I<sub>0</sub>
 +
|=
 +
|the initial intensity of photons (or radiation in general)
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|s
 +
|=
 +
|a proportionality constant that reflects the total probability of a photon being scattered or absorbed
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
 +
|=
 +
|the linear attenuation coefficient
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|x
 +
|=
 +
|distance traveled (thickness of material)
 +
|}
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+Linear Attenuation Coefficients (in cm<sup>-1</sup>) for a range of materials at gamma-ray energies of 100, 200 and 500 keV.<ref>https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Basic_Physics_of_Nuclear_Medicine/Attenuation_of_Gamma-Rays</ref>
 +
!Absorber
 +
!100 keV
 +
!200 keV
 +
!500 keV
 +
|-
 +
|'''Air'''
 +
|0.000195
 +
|0.000159
 +
|0.000112
 +
|-
 +
|'''Water'''
 +
|0.167
 +
|0.136
 +
|0.097
 +
|-
 +
|'''Carbon'''
 +
|0.335
 +
|0.274
 +
|0.196
 +
|-
 +
|'''Aluminium'''
 +
|0.435
 +
|0.324
 +
|0.227
 +
|-
 +
|'''Iron'''
 +
|2.72
 +
|1.09
 +
|0.655
 +
|-
 +
|'''Copper'''
 +
|3.8
 +
|1.309
 +
|0.73
 +
|-
 +
|'''Lead'''
 +
|59.7
 +
|10.15
 +
|1.64
 +
|} 
 +
 
 +
the linear attenuation coefficient µ is not commonly found in the litterature, the mass attenuation coefficient µ<sub>m</sub> is usually used instead.  The coefficient is also dependent on the type of radiation, so a complete solution  for radiation protection requires multiple analysis of the type of radiation to be protected against.     
 +
 
 +
Conversion is quite simple as: 
 +
 
 +
µ=µ<sub>m</sub>*density of the material   
 +
 
 +
List of mass attenuation coefficients<ref>https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/attenuationCoef.htm</ref> can be found at the NIST website. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/tab3.html     
  
 
==Active shielding==
 
==Active shielding==
Active shielding against radiation involves a manmade magnetic field which deflects ionized particles in the same manner as the Earth's. Such fields would require infeasible amounts of energy to generate and would also pose a major risk to anyone approaching the craft or base, as it would create bands of trapped particles similar to the Van Allen belts.<ref name=Logan />
+
Active shielding against radiation involves a manmade magnetic field which deflects ionized particles in the same manner as the Earth's. Such fields would require infeasible amounts of energy to generate and would also pose a major risk to anyone approaching the craft or base, as it would create bands of trapped particles similar to the Van Allen belts.<ref name="Logan" />
  
 
Nevertheless, it might be possible to situate a base in such a location that one of the residual Martian magnetic fields offers a nett benefit. Care should certainly be taken not to situate it where the fields concentrate radiation.
 
Nevertheless, it might be possible to situate a base in such a location that one of the residual Martian magnetic fields offers a nett benefit. Care should certainly be taken not to situate it where the fields concentrate radiation.
Line 19: Line 99:
  
 
Possible behavioural choices which minimize the risk from these include:
 
Possible behavioural choices which minimize the risk from these include:
 +
 
*Avoiding daytime [[EVA]] when there is a significan risk from solar radiation.
 
*Avoiding daytime [[EVA]] when there is a significan risk from solar radiation.
 
*Working preferentially close to natural or manmade objects, such as habitats, rovers or cliffs which provide additional (if not omni-directional) shielding.
 
*Working preferentially close to natural or manmade objects, such as habitats, rovers or cliffs which provide additional (if not omni-directional) shielding.

Revision as of 05:06, 21 April 2019

Water-shield Greenhouse Concept

Shielding against radiation is considered a very difficult task. For example, a proton or alpha particle cosmic ray of "medium" energy can pass through more than a metre of aluminium, not counting the effects of secondary radiation[1]. With this in mind, it is clear that any Martian colonists would have to take a holistic approach, reducing their radiation exposure at every possible opportunity through shielding and risk-mitigating behaviour.

Passive shielding

The Mars Foundation concept for a side-lit greenhouse.

In most cases, matter placed between a person (or radiation-sensitive equipment) and radiation source reduces the amount of radiation they absorb. The effectiveness of the shielding increases with the mass of the shielding and decreases with the atomic mass of the elements used for the shielding. For example, 1kg of hydrogen offers more protection then 1kg of aluminium, 2kg of aluminium offers more protection than 1kg of aluminium and 1kg of hydrogen offers more protection than 2kg of aluminium.[2]

Mars One's solution is a thick layer of regolith on top of the settlement modules. An effective shield will require at least several hundred grams of regolith per square centimeter, according to one study.[3] Using a regolith density estimate of 1.4 g/cm3[4], this means the regolith layer would need to be over 2 meters deep. For concrete with an average density of 2.4 g/cm3 the required thickness might be less.

The attenuation of radiation follows the Beer Lamberth law.[5]

I=Io*e-ux

Where: I = the intensity of photons transmitted across some distance x
I0 = the initial intensity of photons (or radiation in general)
s = a proportionality constant that reflects the total probability of a photon being scattered or absorbed
µ = the linear attenuation coefficient
x = distance traveled (thickness of material)
Linear Attenuation Coefficients (in cm-1) for a range of materials at gamma-ray energies of 100, 200 and 500 keV.[6]
Absorber 100 keV 200 keV 500 keV
Air 0.000195 0.000159 0.000112
Water 0.167 0.136 0.097
Carbon 0.335 0.274 0.196
Aluminium 0.435 0.324 0.227
Iron 2.72 1.09 0.655
Copper 3.8 1.309 0.73
Lead 59.7 10.15 1.64

the linear attenuation coefficient µ is not commonly found in the litterature, the mass attenuation coefficient µm is usually used instead. The coefficient is also dependent on the type of radiation, so a complete solution for radiation protection requires multiple analysis of the type of radiation to be protected against.

Conversion is quite simple as:

µ=µm*density of the material

List of mass attenuation coefficients[7] can be found at the NIST website. https://physics.nist.gov/PhysRefData/XrayMassCoef/tab3.html

Active shielding

Active shielding against radiation involves a manmade magnetic field which deflects ionized particles in the same manner as the Earth's. Such fields would require infeasible amounts of energy to generate and would also pose a major risk to anyone approaching the craft or base, as it would create bands of trapped particles similar to the Van Allen belts.[1]

Nevertheless, it might be possible to situate a base in such a location that one of the residual Martian magnetic fields offers a nett benefit. Care should certainly be taken not to situate it where the fields concentrate radiation.

Also, it might be possible (assuming one could generate the required magnetic field in some way) to have the radiation belts of the habitat pass through some sort of physical barrier, which scrubs them of particles.

Risk-mitigating behaviour

The possible sources of radiation on Mars are manmade sources, such as nuclear reactors or medical equipment, solar radiation, galactic cosmic radiation and naturally occuring radioactive elements on Mars.

Possible behavioural choices which minimize the risk from these include:

  • Avoiding daytime EVA when there is a significan risk from solar radiation.
  • Working preferentially close to natural or manmade objects, such as habitats, rovers or cliffs which provide additional (if not omni-directional) shielding.
  • Entering a storm shelter when there is a high-radiation risk from solar particle events.

References

  1. 1.0 1.1 Operational medicine and health care delivery - J.S. Logan, in S.E. Churchill ed. Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1 - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 154-156.
  2. Radiation biology - J.R. Letaw, in S.E. Churchill ed. Fundamentals of space life sciences, Volume 1 - 1997, ISBN 0-89464-051-8 pp. 16-17.
  3. Slaba, T. C., Mertens, C. J., & Blattnig, S. R. (2013). Radiation Shielding Optimization on Mars. NASA/TP–2013-217983. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/20130012456.pdf
  4. Kim, M. Y., Thibeault, S. A., Simonsen, L. C., & Wilson, J. W. Comparison of Martian Meteorites and Martian Regolith as Shield Materials for Galactic Cosmic Rays. NASA TP-1998-208724. Retrieved from https://ntrs.nasa.gov/archive/nasa/casi.ntrs.nasa.gov/19980237030.pdf.
  5. https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/attenuationCoef.htm
  6. https://en.wikibooks.org/wiki/Basic_Physics_of_Nuclear_Medicine/Attenuation_of_Gamma-Rays
  7. https://www.nde-ed.org/EducationResources/CommunityCollege/Radiography/Physics/attenuationCoef.htm