Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marspedia's popularity"
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) |
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 6: | Line 6: | ||
:I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing. Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects. For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | :I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing. Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects. For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
::... which seems to fit ''" Are people too busy struggling their daily life?"'' best. Yeah, that is my problem too. And most people seem not to be interested in such a "weired" idea of colonizing Mars at all. And yet, the number of Mars Society members is constantly rising. Is it for them easy enough to pay a membership fee, but contributing is to hard? I am trying to think what keeps them away from Marspedia? And what can we do to encourage them? -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | ::... which seems to fit ''" Are people too busy struggling their daily life?"'' best. Yeah, that is my problem too. And most people seem not to be interested in such a "weired" idea of colonizing Mars at all. And yet, the number of Mars Society members is constantly rising. Is it for them easy enough to pay a membership fee, but contributing is to hard? I am trying to think what keeps them away from Marspedia? And what can we do to encourage them? -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Whenever I read the following on the front page, I often want to shake my head. - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 04:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC) These have crackpot written all over them: | ||
| + | No Need to be Notable | ||
| + | No Need to be Neutral | ||
| + | Commercial Links are OK | ||
Revision as of 21:15, 25 November 2009
Hi!
I drop links to pertinent articles whenever the concepts come up in discussion. I recommend you guys do that as well. - Jarogers2001 04:10, 26 November 2009 (UTC)
The Quality of the Site
- I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing. Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects. For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--Farred 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
- ... which seems to fit " Are people too busy struggling their daily life?" best. Yeah, that is my problem too. And most people seem not to be interested in such a "weired" idea of colonizing Mars at all. And yet, the number of Mars Society members is constantly rising. Is it for them easy enough to pay a membership fee, but contributing is to hard? I am trying to think what keeps them away from Marspedia? And what can we do to encourage them? -- Rfc 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)
- Whenever I read the following on the front page, I often want to shake my head. - Jarogers2001 04:15, 26 November 2009 (UTC) These have crackpot written all over them:
No Need to be Notable No Need to be Neutral Commercial Links are OK
