Difference between revisions of "Talk:Marspedia's popularity"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
(talk)
 
Line 3: Line 3:
 
== The Quality of the Site ==  
 
== The Quality of the Site ==  
 
:I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing.  Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects.  For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 
:I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing.  Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects.  For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
 +
::... which seems to fit ''" Are people too busy struggling their daily life?"'' best. Yeah, that is my problem too. And most people seem not to be interested in such a "weired" idea of colonizing Mars at all. And yet, the number of Mars Society members is constantly rising. Is it for them easy enough to pay a membership fee, but contributing is to hard? I am trying to think what keeps them away from Marspedia? And what can we do to encourage them? -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)

Revision as of 11:53, 16 November 2009

Hi!

The Quality of the Site

I have looked over the questions and cannot suggest a particular failing. Colonizing Mars is hard work, and so is developing good copy describing the prospects. For me the problem has been budgeting time to make good contributions.--Farred 20:25, 11 November 2009 (UTC)
... which seems to fit " Are people too busy struggling their daily life?" best. Yeah, that is my problem too. And most people seem not to be interested in such a "weired" idea of colonizing Mars at all. And yet, the number of Mars Society members is constantly rising. Is it for them easy enough to pay a membership fee, but contributing is to hard? I am trying to think what keeps them away from Marspedia? And what can we do to encourage them? -- Rfc 18:53, 16 November 2009 (UTC)