Talk:Flow battery - Revision history

RichardWSmith at 09:58, 8 December 2022

2022-12-08T09:58:23Z

Michel Lamontagne at 21:08, 7 December 2022

2022-12-07T21:08:56Z

Michel Lamontagne at 21:07, 7 December 2022

2022-12-07T21:07:47Z

RichardWSmith at 00:03, 7 December 2022

2022-12-07T00:03:20Z

Michel Lamontagne at 22:13, 6 December 2022

2022-12-06T22:13:58Z

Michel Lamontagne: Created page with "Would love to find the time to compare to a generator using methane and oxygen for long term storage of energy, or compressed air, or night/day thermal difference. the genera..."

2022-12-06T22:09:11Z

Created page with "Would love to find the time to compare to a generator using methane and oxygen for long term storage of energy, or compressed air, or night/day thermal difference. the genera..."

New page

Would love to find the time to compare to a generator using methane and oxygen for long term storage of energy, or compressed air, or night/day thermal difference.

the generator is more interesting if you can use the waste heat, and is not too difficult to adapt, although you wouldn't have nitrogen involved in the explosion so definitively a big changes there.
Worked on a mining site in Northern Canada where they had 5 large (4-5 MW) gensets that provided both power and heating for the mine on a permafrost area (Raglan). Very Martian in many ways.

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:58, 8 December 2022
Line 17:		Line 17:
	Testing the use of the discussion page. Is it better to just write stuff out and then change it, or discuss it beforehand?		Testing the use of the discussion page. Is it better to just write stuff out and then change it, or discuss it beforehand?
	TBH, I'm also enjoying the chat part. It gest a bit tiresome, just putting stuff out and getting no feedback.		TBH, I'm also enjoying the chat part. It gest a bit tiresome, just putting stuff out and getting no feedback.
		+
		+	***
		+	Rick: Up to you. Maybe put up the stuff that is inarguable, and chat about stuff you are less sure how to approach? Warm regards, Rick.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:08, 7 December 2022
Line 16:		Line 16:

	Testing the use of the discussion page. Is it better to just write stuff out and then change it, or discuss it beforehand?		Testing the use of the discussion page. Is it better to just write stuff out and then change it, or discuss it beforehand?
		+	TBH, I'm also enjoying the chat part. It gest a bit tiresome, just putting stuff out and getting no feedback.

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:07, 7 December 2022
Line 13:		Line 13:
	***		***
	Rick: Hi Michel, why not put these points in pages that people will see?		Rick: Hi Michel, why not put these points in pages that people will see?
		+	***
		+
		+	Testing the use of the discussion page. Is it better to just write stuff out and then change it, or discuss it beforehand?

← Older revision		Revision as of 00:03, 7 December 2022
Line 10:		Line 10:

	https://www.alcoa.com/sustainability/en/elysis		https://www.alcoa.com/sustainability/en/elysis
		+
		+	***
		+	Rick: Hi Michel, why not put these points in pages that people will see?

← Older revision		Revision as of 22:13, 6 December 2022
Line 3:		Line 3:
	the generator is more interesting if you can use the waste heat, and is not too difficult to adapt, although you wouldn't have nitrogen involved in the explosion so definitively a big changes there.		the generator is more interesting if you can use the waste heat, and is not too difficult to adapt, although you wouldn't have nitrogen involved in the explosion so definitively a big changes there.
	Worked on a mining site in Northern Canada where they had 5 large (4-5 MW) gensets that provided both power and heating for the mine on a permafrost area (Raglan). Very Martian in many ways.		Worked on a mining site in Northern Canada where they had 5 large (4-5 MW) gensets that provided both power and heating for the mine on a permafrost area (Raglan). Very Martian in many ways.
		+
		+	Aluminum air is interesting, in particular if we use the new carbon free process for aluminum production. Would take a lot of development though.
		+	https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Aluminium%E2%80%93air_battery
		+
		+	Carbon free aluminum may be a requirement for Mars anyway, in particular if much of the carbon goes into methane for vehicle fuel or into the Life support system.
		+
		+	https://www.alcoa.com/sustainability/en/elysis