Talk:Funeral - Revision history

Spriditis: /* Controversy? */ Section title makes figurative claim

2011-07-05T09:45:32Z

Controversy?: Section title makes figurative claim

Spriditis: Undo revision 5618 by 64.8.69.51 (Talk) Restoring deletion

2011-07-05T09:12:09Z

Undo revision 5618 by 64.8.69.51 (Talk) Restoring deletion

64.8.69.51: /* RIuPwvAwXiGGWPz */ new section

2011-07-05T07:40:29Z

RIuPwvAwXiGGWPz: new section

Rfc: /* Controversy? */

2007-12-18T08:31:02Z

Controversy?

Ioneill: /* Controversy? */

2007-12-17T21:20:54Z

Controversy?

Ioneill at 20:58, 17 December 2007

2007-12-17T20:58:56Z

Rfc: /* Controversy? */

2007-12-17T10:16:21Z

Controversy?

Ioneill: /* Controversy? */ make modifications where needed

2007-12-17T09:50:14Z

Controversy?: make modifications where needed

Rfc at 08:18, 17 December 2007

2007-12-17T08:18:55Z

Ioneill: New page: Funerals are generally religious ceremonies intended as a final "good bye" to loved ones. How will a colony on Mars carry out the rites of the dead? -- ~~~~

2007-12-17T05:34:12Z

New page: Funerals are generally religious ceremonies intended as a final "good bye" to loved ones. How will a colony on Mars carry out the rites of the dead? -- ~~~~

New page

Funerals are generally religious ceremonies intended as a final "good bye" to loved ones. How will a colony on Mars carry out the rites of the dead? -- [[User:Ioneill|Ioneill]] 05:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

@@ Line 3: / Line 3: @@
 ==Controversy?==
 Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 :Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
 ::Ooops, I didn't recognize your comment "controversial tag for fun". Okay, how do we go on with question tags in general? I would not feel very comfortable with changing the article's text and removing the tag, because I might got the question wrong or I did not see every aspect of the question. May be, the changed article text provokes more or different questions. Therefore, I would like to leave it to the inquirer to either remove or alter the posed question. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 10:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
@@ Line 14: / Line 15: @@
 ::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:12, 5 July 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
−
−	~~== RIuPwvAwXiGGWPz ==~~
−
−	~~Good to see a tlanet at work. I cant match that.~~

← Older revision		Revision as of 07:40, 5 July 2011
Line 14:		Line 14:

	::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)		::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	== RIuPwvAwXiGGWPz ==
		+
		+	Good to see a tlanet at work. I cant match that.

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:31, 18 December 2007
Line 12:		Line 12:
	:::'''<nowiki>{{moral question\|Would settlers be happy with eating vegetables grown from the remnants of their dead crewmates? - [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]]'' <br/> This problem can be avoided by having separate sections in the greenhouses - one for food production, another for funerals. - ~~~}}</nowiki>'''		:::'''<nowiki>{{moral question\|Would settlers be happy with eating vegetables grown from the remnants of their dead crewmates? - [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]]'' <br/> This problem can be avoided by having separate sections in the greenhouses - one for food production, another for funerals. - ~~~}}</nowiki>'''
	:::However, if you don't think it even warrants an answer, just remove it :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 21:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		:::However, if you don't think it even warrants an answer, just remove it :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 21:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	::Actually, I find the talk page is the right place for discussion. To raise questions on the article page is fine, but the discussion about this question should be on the talk page. How about my change in the template? My intention is to draw the attention to the talk page. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:31, 18 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 21:20, 17 December 2007
Line 7:		Line 7:

	:::Well, the "question tags" are by no means a ''finished product'', I'm not even sure if they will be used very much. They will be useful however, once we have a lot of contributors, who can raise questions when and where they wish. So, feel free to answer the question, by putting an "answer" directly underneath with your signed name (just 3 tildas - <nowiki>~~~</nowiki>). If it doesnt look right, we can simply remove the tag. Use your judgement, it's good to test these things out. If it provokes more questions, then that is fantastic! It will be superb to have some good debates over hard-to-solve problems :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 20:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		:::Well, the "question tags" are by no means a ''finished product'', I'm not even sure if they will be used very much. They will be useful however, once we have a lot of contributors, who can raise questions when and where they wish. So, feel free to answer the question, by putting an "answer" directly underneath with your signed name (just 3 tildas - <nowiki>~~~</nowiki>). If it doesnt look right, we can simply remove the tag. Use your judgement, it's good to test these things out. If it provokes more questions, then that is fantastic! It will be superb to have some good debates over hard-to-solve problems :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 20:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::As an example, edit the question tag like this:
		+	{{moral question\|Would settlers be happy with eating vegetables grown from the remnants of their dead crewmates? - [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]]'' <br/> This problem can be avoided by having separate sections in the greenhouses - one for food production, another for funerals. - [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]]}}
		+	:::'''<nowiki>{{moral question\|Would settlers be happy with eating vegetables grown from the remnants of their dead crewmates? - [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]]'' <br/> This problem can be avoided by having separate sections in the greenhouses - one for food production, another for funerals. - ~~~}}</nowiki>'''
		+	:::However, if you don't think it even warrants an answer, just remove it :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 21:20, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 20:58, 17 December 2007
Line 5:		Line 5:
	:Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		:Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
	::Ooops, I didn't recognize your comment "controversial tag for fun". Okay, how do we go on with question tags in general? I would not feel very comfortable with changing the article's text and removing the tag, because I might got the question wrong or I did not see every aspect of the question. May be, the changed article text provokes more or different questions. Therefore, I would like to leave it to the inquirer to either remove or alter the posed question. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 10:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		::Ooops, I didn't recognize your comment "controversial tag for fun". Okay, how do we go on with question tags in general? I would not feel very comfortable with changing the article's text and removing the tag, because I might got the question wrong or I did not see every aspect of the question. May be, the changed article text provokes more or different questions. Therefore, I would like to leave it to the inquirer to either remove or alter the posed question. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 10:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	:::Well, the "question tags" are by no means a ''finished product'', I'm not even sure if they will be used very much. They will be useful however, once we have a lot of contributors, who can raise questions when and where they wish. So, feel free to answer the question, by putting an "answer" directly underneath with your signed name (just 3 tildas - <nowiki>~~~</nowiki>). If it doesnt look right, we can simply remove the tag. Use your judgement, it's good to test these things out. If it provokes more questions, then that is fantastic! It will be superb to have some good debates over hard-to-solve problems :-) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 20:58, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 10:16, 17 December 2007
Line 4:		Line 4:
	Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
	:Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		:Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	::Ooops, I didn't recognize your comment "controversial tag for fun". Okay, how do we go on with question tags in general? I would not feel very comfortable with changing the article's text and removing the tag, because I might got the question wrong or I did not see every aspect of the question. May be, the changed article text provokes more or different questions. Therefore, I would like to leave it to the inquirer to either remove or alter the posed question. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 10:16, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 09:50, 17 December 2007
Line 3:		Line 3:
	==Controversy?==		==Controversy?==
	Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+	:Apologies, I didn't mean to leave the "controversial" tag on this article, I was using it as a test for the template. I will remove it now. Feel free to change the "Moral Question" tag with an answer, if not remove it all together. -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 09:50, 17 December 2007 (UTC)

← Older revision		Revision as of 08:18, 17 December 2007
Line 1:		Line 1:
	Funerals are generally religious ceremonies intended as a final "good bye" to loved ones. How will a colony on Mars carry out the rites of the dead? -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 05:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)		Funerals are generally religious ceremonies intended as a final "good bye" to loved ones. How will a colony on Mars carry out the rites of the dead? -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 05:34, 17 December 2007 (UTC)
		+
		+	==Controversy?==
		+	Is there really a controversy? The burial of remnants in soil is best practice on Earth (and so it is with cremation). I have specified the powder burial more precisely, so that vegetables are no longer in contact. Possibly your "moral question" must be updated. -- [[User:Rfc\|Rfc]] 08:18, 17 December 2007 (UTC)