Talk:Nuclear brick - Revision history

Frontiersman at 04:20, 23 February 2010

2010-02-23T04:20:23Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:20, 23 February 2010
Line 4:		Line 4:
	According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This precludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This precludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

	Good catch, thanks. Fixed. [[User:Frontiersman\|Frontiersman]] 04:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)		:Good catch, thanks. Fixed. [[User:Frontiersman\|Frontiersman]] 04:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Frontiersman at 04:19, 23 February 2010

2010-02-23T04:19:54Z

← Older revision		Revision as of 05:19, 23 February 2010
Line 3:		Line 3:

	According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This precludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This precludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

			Good catch, thanks. Fixed. [[User:Frontiersman\|Frontiersman]] 04:19, 23 February 2010 (UTC)

Farred: /* Native americum 241? */

2010-02-22T03:32:33Z

Native americum 241?

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:32, 22 February 2010
Line 2:		Line 2:
	The source referenced for nuclear bricks only indicates that americum 241 is a biproduct of nuclear reactors. There is nothing about any possibility of producing americum 242 from potential native americum 241 on Mars.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		The source referenced for nuclear bricks only indicates that americum 241 is a biproduct of nuclear reactors. There is nothing about any possibility of producing americum 242 from potential native americum 241 on Mars.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

	According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This ~~procludes~~ there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This precludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:32, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Farred: talk

2010-02-22T03:30:56Z

talk

← Older revision		Revision as of 04:30, 22 February 2010
Line 1:		Line 1:
	== Native americum 241? ==		== Native americum 241? ==
	The source referenced for nuclear bricks only indicates that americum 241 is a biproduct of nuclear reactors. There is nothing about any possibility of producing americum 242 from potential native americum 241 on Mars.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)		The source referenced for nuclear bricks only indicates that americum 241 is a biproduct of nuclear reactors. There is nothing about any possibility of producing americum 242 from potential native americum 241 on Mars.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

			According to the Wikipedia article on Americium there are no isotopes of Americium with half lives greater than hundreds of years. This procludes there being any native source of this element on Earth or Mars. It is completely an artificial element.--[[User:Farred\|Farred]] 03:30, 22 February 2010 (UTC)

Farred: bad reference

2010-02-22T03:18:35Z

bad reference

New page

== Native americum 241? ==
The source referenced for nuclear bricks only indicates that americum 241 is a biproduct of nuclear reactors. There is nothing about any possibility of producing americum 242 from potential native americum 241 on Mars.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 03:18, 22 February 2010 (UTC)