Difference between revisions of "Meteorites"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 7: Line 7:
 
Small meteorites are best handled by a thick layer or [[regolith]]. [[Mars One]] plans to cover the inflatable [[greenhouse]]s with at least 2 meters of it. Most meteorites are small. [[self-healing puncture protection]] for [[space suit]]s and [[house|facilitie]]s should be installed.
 
Small meteorites are best handled by a thick layer or [[regolith]]. [[Mars One]] plans to cover the inflatable [[greenhouse]]s with at least 2 meters of it. Most meteorites are small. [[self-healing puncture protection]] for [[space suit]]s and [[house|facilitie]]s should be installed.
  
Bigger meteoroids are not frequent, but they can happen. Meteorites a few centimetres in diameter would be fatal. Little can be done to fend them off, the kinetic [[energy]] is much too high.
+
Bigger meteoroids are not frequent
 +
{| class="wikitable"
 +
|+
 +
! colspan="2" |Diameter interval
 +
!diameter, average
 +
!mass, average
 +
! colspan="2" |impacts per year
 +
!Impact energy
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
!um
 +
!um
 +
!um
 +
!kg
 +
!max imp/yr/m2
 +
!min imp/yr/m2
 +
!J
 +
!
 +
|-
 +
|6
 +
|11
 +
|9
 +
|6.9e-13
 +
|23 000
 +
|1 100
 +
|3.9e-8
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|12
 +
|26
 +
|19.5
 +
|7e-12
 +
|7 800
 +
|370
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|27
 +
|57
 +
|42.5
 +
|7.2e-11
 +
|1 800
 +
|84
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|58
 +
|124
 +
|91
 +
|7.1e-10
 +
|460
 +
|21
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|125
 +
|268
 +
|196.5
 +
|7.2e-9
 +
|93
 +
|4.3
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|269
 +
|576
 +
|422.5
 +
|7.1e-8
 +
|7.8
 +
|0.36
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|577
 +
|1240
 +
|908.5
 +
|7.1e-7
 +
|0,42
 +
|0.016
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|1241
 +
|2680
 +
|1960.5
 +
|7.1e-6
 +
|0,009
 +
|0,00041
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|2681
 +
|5757
 +
|4219
 +
|7.1e-5
 +
|0,000096
 +
|0,0000045
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|-
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|
 +
|}
 +
, but they can happen. Meteorites a few centimetres in diameter would be fatal. Little can be done to fend them off, the kinetic [[energy]] is much too high.
  
 
There are possible precautions. One is to modularize the settlement with [[fail-safe|redundant]] facilities.  In the case of an impact, the affected module may be damaged, but the remaining modules allow the surviving settlers to continue the settlement process.
 
There are possible precautions. One is to modularize the settlement with [[fail-safe|redundant]] facilities.  In the case of an impact, the affected module may be damaged, but the remaining modules allow the surviving settlers to continue the settlement process.
Line 13: Line 122:
 
For even bigger impacts, the required distances between the redundant modules must be larger. When the settlement reaches 20 persons, a second settlement may be built, dividing the colony in two parts, with a distance of a few hundred meters. Those two settlements should be equipped to work independently from each other, but cables and pipes between them help to support each other in emergency situations, e.g. to supply [[oxygen]] and [[electricity]]. A [[railroad]] or tunnels between them would allow material and personnel transportation.  
 
For even bigger impacts, the required distances between the redundant modules must be larger. When the settlement reaches 20 persons, a second settlement may be built, dividing the colony in two parts, with a distance of a few hundred meters. Those two settlements should be equipped to work independently from each other, but cables and pipes between them help to support each other in emergency situations, e.g. to supply [[oxygen]] and [[electricity]]. A [[railroad]] or tunnels between them would allow material and personnel transportation.  
  
The frequency of meteorites and their dimension are known<ref>BLAND, Philip A. Quantification of meteorite infall rates from accumulations in deserts, and meteorite accumulations on Mars. In : ''Accretion of extraterrestrial matter throughout Earth’s history''. Springer, Boston, MA, 2001. p. 267-303.</ref><ref>@ARTICLE{1969PASP...81..399D,
+
The frequency of meteorites and their dimension are known<ref>BLAND, Philip A. Quantification of meteorite infall rates from accumulations in deserts, and meteorite accumulations on Mars. In : ''Accretion of extraterrestrial matter throughout Earth’s history''. Springer, Boston, MA, 2001. p. 267-303.</ref><ref>DYCUS, Robert D. The meteorite flux at the surface of Mars. ''Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific'', 1969, p. 399-414.</ref>.    
      author = {{Dycus}, Robert D.},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>      title = "{The Meteorite Flux at the Surface of Mars}",
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>    journal = {\pasp},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>      year = 1969,
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>      month = aug,
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>    volume = {81},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>    number = {481},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>      pages = {399},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>        doi = {10.1086/128793},
 
<nowiki> </nowiki>    adsurl = {https://ui.adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/1969PASP...81..399D},
 
      adsnote = {Provided by the SAO/NASA Astrophysics Data System}
 
}</ref>.  
 
  
 
==Observations of Meteorite Impacts on Mars==
 
==Observations of Meteorite Impacts on Mars==

Revision as of 12:12, 13 September 2020

Definition

A meteorite is a body of space debris that enters the atmosphere of a planet and survives the friction with surrounding atmospheric gases to impact the surface energetically. Impact causes planetary cratering, ejecta and dust (forming a layer of regolith on planets with low geological activity such as Mars). This poses an obvious risk to a Martian settlement, and due to the tenuous atmosphere of Mars, smaller debris have the greater chance to impact the surface than on Earth.

Risk and Mitigation

Small meteorites are best handled by a thick layer or regolith. Mars One plans to cover the inflatable greenhouses with at least 2 meters of it. Most meteorites are small. self-healing puncture protection for space suits and facilities should be installed.

Bigger meteoroids are not frequent

Diameter interval diameter, average mass, average impacts per year Impact energy
um um um kg max imp/yr/m2 min imp/yr/m2 J
6 11 9 6.9e-13 23 000 1 100 3.9e-8
12 26 19.5 7e-12 7 800 370
27 57 42.5 7.2e-11 1 800 84
58 124 91 7.1e-10 460 21
125 268 196.5 7.2e-9 93 4.3
269 576 422.5 7.1e-8 7.8 0.36
577 1240 908.5 7.1e-7 0,42 0.016
1241 2680 1960.5 7.1e-6 0,009 0,00041
2681 5757 4219 7.1e-5 0,000096 0,0000045

, but they can happen. Meteorites a few centimetres in diameter would be fatal. Little can be done to fend them off, the kinetic energy is much too high.

There are possible precautions. One is to modularize the settlement with redundant facilities. In the case of an impact, the affected module may be damaged, but the remaining modules allow the surviving settlers to continue the settlement process.

For even bigger impacts, the required distances between the redundant modules must be larger. When the settlement reaches 20 persons, a second settlement may be built, dividing the colony in two parts, with a distance of a few hundred meters. Those two settlements should be equipped to work independently from each other, but cables and pipes between them help to support each other in emergency situations, e.g. to supply oxygen and electricity. A railroad or tunnels between them would allow material and personnel transportation.

The frequency of meteorites and their dimension are known[1][2].

Observations of Meteorite Impacts on Mars

Mars Global Surveyor images of the same site in 1999 and 2006 - Impact from meteorite is obvious.

On January 9, 2006 the Mars Global Surveyor MOC science operations team came to the realization that their camera (used primarily to map the Martian surface) might be able to locate and characterize fresh impact craters on the surface of Mars. Such a survey would provide useful information about the current meteorite impact rate. This survey would be the first of its kind ever carried out on a Solar System body (including the Earth-Moon system) due to the unprecedented number of high resolution cameras inserted into Mars orbit.[3]

In results gathered on January 6, 2006, the MOC had acquired a new feature on the Martian surface in Arabia Terra in one of its images. The feature was circular and very dark. At the time, the camera was capturing images at a resolution of 240 meters/pixel, so there were some ambiguities as to what the blurred feature was. The team began exploring the possible scenarios, but after proving shadows of the two moons, Phobos and Deimos were not to blame, they quickly realized that something in the area was new when compared with images taken by Mariner 9 (in 1971) through to the Mars Express mission (in 2003). There was still the possibility that the dark circular object may have been caused by the removal of sand and dust due to high winds in the region so better observations had to be carried out.

To increase the resolution in the images, a technique known as Roll-Only Targeted Observation (ROTO) was employed. This massively improved the images for analysis, the new resolution registered at 1.5 meters/pixel allowing the team to see the main impact crater and several smaller craters arcing away from the large dark spot. Another observational technique – compensated Pitch and Roll Observation (cPROTO) – was used to improve the images further until the evidence was indisputable. A fresh impact crater had been discovered.

Mars Odyssey's THEMIS instrument and Mars Express' High Resolution Camera (HRSC) were able to provide supplementary observations of the area to constrain the impact date to some time between November 12, 2004 and January 6, 2006. Since this first discovery in January 6, 2006, another 20 new impact craters have been discovered by the MOC.

Open issues

  • What is the size and frequency of meteorites on Mars?
  • What is the probability for a human body to be hit by a meteorite on Mars in an hour?

See also

References

  1. BLAND, Philip A. Quantification of meteorite infall rates from accumulations in deserts, and meteorite accumulations on Mars. In : Accretion of extraterrestrial matter throughout Earth’s history. Springer, Boston, MA, 2001. p. 267-303.
  2. DYCUS, Robert D. The meteorite flux at the surface of Mars. Publications of the Astronomical Society of the Pacific, 1969, p. 399-414.
  3. Go to: WayBackMachine. Enter: [http://www.astroengine.net/article.php?id_art=36]. Chose the 9th day of June 2007.

v · d · eManned Missions to Mars

Concepts: Greenhouse · Settlements · Locations · General
Hazards: Space Weather · Climate · General
Technology: Hi-Tech · Lo-Tech · Energy · Spaceflight science · Communication · General
Human Considerations: Economics · Health · Governance · Trade · Law · Social