Nuclear thermal propulsion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 3: | Line 3: | ||
==History of nuclear thermal propulsion== | ==History of nuclear thermal propulsion== | ||
=== American === | ===American=== | ||
Nerva<ref>Nerva on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA</ref> | Nerva<ref>Nerva on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA</ref> | ||
=== Russian === | ===Russian=== | ||
== Analysis of use == | ==Analysis of use== | ||
===Advantages=== | ===Advantages=== | ||
| Line 27: | Line 27: | ||
*Thrust to weight ratio usually lower than 1 (cannot take off from a planet) | *Thrust to weight ratio usually lower than 1 (cannot take off from a planet) | ||
=== Types === | ===Types=== | ||
* Solid core | *Solid core | ||
* Gas core | *Gas core | ||
* Nuclear light bulb, open and closed | *Nuclear light bulb, open and closed | ||
== References == | |||
<references /> | |||
Revision as of 18:30, 9 August 2019
Nuclear thermal propulsion uses a nuclear core to heat a propellant and provide propulsion to a space vehicle.
History of nuclear thermal propulsion
American
Nerva[1]
Russian
Analysis of use
Advantages
- Higher ISP than chemical
- Higher power energy source
- Shorter travel time
- Oberth effect
- Self cooling
Disadvantages
- Cost
- Cost of development
- Risk of accident
- Lower ISP than electric
- Low public trust
- Thrust to weight ratio usually lower than 1 (cannot take off from a planet)
Types
- Solid core
- Gas core
- Nuclear light bulb, open and closed
References
- ↑ Nerva on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA