Template talk:Element: Difference between revisions

Latest revision as of 23:08, 24 November 2007

Do we think that this template will be of any use? -- Ioneill 20:11, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Yes, although I'd like to get rid of the "number of neutrons" thing (which isn't a constant in anyway whatsoever) and add some fields like those on the Wikipedia element template (such as relative atomic mass and electronegativity). Peter 21:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Agreed, I wasn't sure about including neutrons, as time went on it kinda lost relevance. Will look into adding more fields, sooner rather than later, before it appears in too many articles. ;) -- Ioneill 22:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

Revision as of 22:29, 24 November 2007 view source PeterBrett (talk \| contribs) 51 edits No edit summary ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:08, 24 November 2007 view source Ioneill (talk \| contribs) Bureaucrats, Administrators 1,333 edits mNo edit summary
Line 2:		Line 2:

	:Yes, although I'd like to get rid of the "number of neutrons" thing (which isn't a constant in anyway whatsoever) and add some fields like those on the Wikipedia element template (such as relative atomic mass and electronegativity). [[User:PeterBrett\|Peter]] 21:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)		:Yes, although I'd like to get rid of the "number of neutrons" thing (which isn't a constant in anyway whatsoever) and add some fields like those on the Wikipedia element template (such as relative atomic mass and electronegativity). [[User:PeterBrett\|Peter]] 21:29, 24 November 2007 (UTC)

			::Agreed, I wasn't sure about including neutrons, as time went on it kinda lost relevance. Will look into adding more fields, sooner rather than later, before it appears in too many articles. ;) -- [[User:Ioneill\|Ioneill]] 22:08, 24 November 2007 (UTC)