Nuclear thermal propulsion: Difference between revisions
No edit summary |
No edit summary |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Nuclear thermal propulsion uses a nuclear core to heat a propellant and provide propulsion to a space vehicle. | Nuclear thermal propulsion uses a nuclear core to heat a propellant and provide propulsion to a space vehicle. | ||
== History of nuclear thermal propulsion == | ==History of nuclear thermal propulsion== | ||
=== | === American === | ||
Nerva<ref>Nerva on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA</ref> | |||
=== Russian === | |||
== | == Analysis of use == | ||
* Cost | ===Advantages=== | ||
* Cost of development | |||
* Risk of accident | *Higher ISP than chemical | ||
*Higher power energy source | |||
*Shorter travel time | |||
*Oberth effect | |||
*Self cooling | |||
===Disadvantages=== | |||
*Cost | |||
*Cost of development | |||
*Risk of accident | |||
*Lower ISP than electric | |||
*Low public trust | |||
*Thrust to weight ratio usually lower than 1 (cannot take off from a planet) | |||
=== Types === | |||
* Solid core | |||
* Gas core | |||
* Nuclear light bulb, open and closed | |||
Revision as of 18:30, 9 August 2019
Nuclear thermal propulsion uses a nuclear core to heat a propellant and provide propulsion to a space vehicle.
History of nuclear thermal propulsion
American
Nerva[1]
Russian
Analysis of use
Advantages
- Higher ISP than chemical
- Higher power energy source
- Shorter travel time
- Oberth effect
- Self cooling
Disadvantages
- Cost
- Cost of development
- Risk of accident
- Lower ISP than electric
- Low public trust
- Thrust to weight ratio usually lower than 1 (cannot take off from a planet)
Types
- Solid core
- Gas core
- Nuclear light bulb, open and closed
- ↑ Nerva on Wikipedia: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/NERVA