Difference between revisions of "Talk:Old Home"
(→Main Page development: If I had a solution for the copyright box it would have been solved before now. 8\) |
|||
| Line 13: | Line 13: | ||
For now, over to you! -- [[User:Ioneill|Ioneill]] 04:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | For now, over to you! -- [[User:Ioneill|Ioneill]] 04:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
:I like the new appearance. It is better than ever! -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 07:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | :I like the new appearance. It is better than ever! -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 07:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ::It looks wonderful; I can't wait to steal it for Lunarpedia. 8) The copyright rules notice is too large and unwieldy, and as you may have noticed, in over a year I've not figured out a more compact solution that imparts the required information. Maybe a terse summary with a link to a more detailed version? How much can we pare down the summary if so? --[[User:Strangelv|Strangelv]] 08:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:30, 23 November 2007
This page has been protected to avoid anonymous attacks.
Main Page development
I have made an attempt to upgrade the front page to improve design, ease of use and accessability to the wiki. I have tried to focus on accessibility for new users as we need to increase online interest in our efforts.
Some recent updates:
- Inclusion of a "Featured articles" on the front page (see user:Ioneill for development details).
- Creating Marspedia:About page to move bulk text from main page.
- Creating "Marspedia News" section on front page - for development purposes (i.e. new site developments/announcements), not to advertise new content.
Unresolved areas:
- Copyright notice, should it be moved to a less-prominent position?
For now, over to you! -- Ioneill 04:19, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- I like the new appearance. It is better than ever! -- Rfc 07:43, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
- It looks wonderful; I can't wait to steal it for Lunarpedia. 8) The copyright rules notice is too large and unwieldy, and as you may have noticed, in over a year I've not figured out a more compact solution that imparts the required information. Maybe a terse summary with a link to a more detailed version? How much can we pare down the summary if so? --Strangelv 08:30, 23 November 2007 (UTC)
