Jump to content

Eccentricity: Difference between revisions

From Marspedia
Spriditis (talk | contribs)
m Undo revision 6045 by 120.203.1.250 (Talk) vandalism
Line 1: Line 1:
{{wikipedia}}
{{wikipedia}}
For the love of God, keep wtrinig these articles.
==Definition==
 
Any orbit in planetary dynamics can be assumed to be of conic cross-section shape. The '''eccentricity''' of this conic section, the orbit's eccentricity, is an important parameter of the orbit that defines its absolute shape. Eccentricity may be interpreted as a measure of how much this shape deviates from a circle.
 
Eccentricity (<math>e\,\!</math>) is strictly defined for all circular, elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic orbits and may take following values:<ref>[http://en.wikipedia.org/w/index.php?title=Orbital_eccentricity Wikipedia article on eccentricity.]</ref>
 
*for circular orbits: <math>e=0\,\!</math>,
*for elliptic orbits: <math>0<e<1\,\!</math>,
*for parabolic orbits: <math>e=1\,\!</math>,
*for hyperbolic orbits: <math>e>1\,\!</math>.


==Calculation==
==Calculation==

Revision as of 16:39, 3 November 2011


This article is based on a Wikipedia article and is controlled by version 3.0 of Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike (CC-BY-SA).


Definition

Any orbit in planetary dynamics can be assumed to be of conic cross-section shape. The eccentricity of this conic section, the orbit's eccentricity, is an important parameter of the orbit that defines its absolute shape. Eccentricity may be interpreted as a measure of how much this shape deviates from a circle.

Eccentricity (e) is strictly defined for all circular, elliptic, parabolic and hyperbolic orbits and may take following values:[1]

  • for circular orbits: e=0,
  • for elliptic orbits: 0<e<1,
  • for parabolic orbits: e=1,
  • for hyperbolic orbits: e>1.

Calculation

For elliptic orbits, eccentricity can be calculated from distance at periapsis and apoapsis:

e=dadpda+dp
=12(da/dp)+1

where:

  • dp is distance at periapsis (closest approach),
  • da is distance at apoapsis (farthest approach).

References