Difference between revisions of "Talk:Oxygen"
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
I vote for protection. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 14:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | I vote for protection. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 14:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | :I have done a little investigation. The result: These phrases can be found on many sites on the internet. Apparently this is some kind of bot. Once adjusted to specific sites it returns periodically in order to leave its messages, probably based upon a set of predefined phrases. If I am right, the spook can be easily stopped by disturbing the automatic procedure. Since the bot seems to address the subheading "Biological significance" I am gonna change this subheading. Let's see what happens ... -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 20:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC) | ||
Latest revision as of 12:57, 2 December 2008
This page is getting spammed a lot. Would it make sense to protect it? --Laertes 01:22, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
I vote for protection. T.Neo 14:37, 30 November 2008 (UTC)
- I have done a little investigation. The result: These phrases can be found on many sites on the internet. Apparently this is some kind of bot. Once adjusted to specific sites it returns periodically in order to leave its messages, probably based upon a set of predefined phrases. If I am right, the spook can be easily stopped by disturbing the automatic procedure. Since the bot seems to address the subheading "Biological significance" I am gonna change this subheading. Let's see what happens ... -- Rfc 20:57, 2 December 2008 (UTC)
