Difference between revisions of "Talk:National Aeronautics and Space Administration (NASA)"
(talk) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:What are you talking about? -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 18:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | :What are you talking about? -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 18:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
*Perhaps you have heard of a group that opposes any sample return from Mars mission because they claim that there is a danger that microbes from Mars could contaminate Earth. Sending astronauts to Mars and returning them is a sample return mission, and as such will see opposition. Samples of Mars have been returned to Earth as chuncks of Mars blasted out of the planet by large impacting bodies. Finding even one such chunck of Mars on Earth as a meteorite indicates that this natural sample return process has occurred many times and there has been no observed detrimental effect from contamination. When I write that Mars is as dead as a doornail, I am writing literally about the biological condition. There are no microbes on Mars to worry about. Some people are stubbornly difficult to convince about this fact, and just do not want to take the chance that Mars microbes would overrun Earth like rabbits overran the Australian outback. I do not imply that the political situation of Mars exploration and development is dead.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 12:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | *Perhaps you have heard of a group that opposes any sample return from Mars mission because they claim that there is a danger that microbes from Mars could contaminate Earth. Sending astronauts to Mars and returning them is a sample return mission, and as such will see opposition. Samples of Mars have been returned to Earth as chuncks of Mars blasted out of the planet by large impacting bodies. Finding even one such chunck of Mars on Earth as a meteorite indicates that this natural sample return process has occurred many times and there has been no observed detrimental effect from contamination. When I write that Mars is as dead as a doornail, I am writing literally about the biological condition. There are no microbes on Mars to worry about. Some people are stubbornly difficult to convince about this fact, and just do not want to take the chance that Mars microbes would overrun Earth like rabbits overran the Australian outback. I do not imply that the political situation of Mars exploration and development is dead.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 12:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | :Okay, I agree. Living is dangerous, and it always ends deadly. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 19:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 11:24, 5 May 2009
This sort of plan will run into opposition from the no-sample-return-from-Mars crowd. Samples have been returned to Earth from Mars numerous times by nature and Mars is as dead as a doornail, but some people need to be worried about something. So, some people worry about microbes from Mars contaminating Earth.--Farred 06:39, 1 May 2009 (UTC)
- What are you talking about? -- Rfc 18:42, 3 May 2009 (UTC)
- Perhaps you have heard of a group that opposes any sample return from Mars mission because they claim that there is a danger that microbes from Mars could contaminate Earth. Sending astronauts to Mars and returning them is a sample return mission, and as such will see opposition. Samples of Mars have been returned to Earth as chuncks of Mars blasted out of the planet by large impacting bodies. Finding even one such chunck of Mars on Earth as a meteorite indicates that this natural sample return process has occurred many times and there has been no observed detrimental effect from contamination. When I write that Mars is as dead as a doornail, I am writing literally about the biological condition. There are no microbes on Mars to worry about. Some people are stubbornly difficult to convince about this fact, and just do not want to take the chance that Mars microbes would overrun Earth like rabbits overran the Australian outback. I do not imply that the political situation of Mars exploration and development is dead.--Farred 12:02, 4 May 2009 (UTC)
- Okay, I agree. Living is dangerous, and it always ends deadly. -- Rfc 19:24, 5 May 2009 (UTC)
