Difference between revisions of "Talk:Sky ramps"
(Created page with "Interesting idea. However, the Mass Driver page seems very similar, although with a different name, perhaps to be combined?") |
|||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
Interesting idea. However, the Mass Driver page seems very similar, although with a different name, perhaps to be combined? | Interesting idea. However, the Mass Driver page seems very similar, although with a different name, perhaps to be combined? | ||
+ | |||
+ | In the text the position of a space elevator might be slightly off the equator; it seems that the horizontal force for a not perfectly vertical space elevator could be handled by regular constructions, but to be confirmed. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The text also could be clearer regarded chemically driven rockets proposals and actual rail guns/magnetic lauchers/mass drivers. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The space Elevator has problems with Phobos. | ||
+ | |||
+ | The mass driver probably has a much higher mass throughput than a space elevator, that is very long and required a large number of cars, or of 'ways' to get any kind of volume to space. |
Revision as of 17:09, 8 March 2021
Interesting idea. However, the Mass Driver page seems very similar, although with a different name, perhaps to be combined?
In the text the position of a space elevator might be slightly off the equator; it seems that the horizontal force for a not perfectly vertical space elevator could be handled by regular constructions, but to be confirmed.
The text also could be clearer regarded chemically driven rockets proposals and actual rail guns/magnetic lauchers/mass drivers.
The space Elevator has problems with Phobos.
The mass driver probably has a much higher mass throughput than a space elevator, that is very long and required a large number of cars, or of 'ways' to get any kind of volume to space.