Difference between revisions of "Talk:Bringing down Phobos"
| Line 8: | Line 8: | ||
Sorry, but rocket technology is pretty much all we have right now, but in response to that, instead of a resource consuming chemical rocket, what about a nuclear rocket instead? If there are any volatile materials within Phobos, they could be utilized as fuel. I seriously doubt the feasibilty of space elevators. Beside that, phobos could act as a way station for spacecraft coming to and from Mars. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 09:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | Sorry, but rocket technology is pretty much all we have right now, but in response to that, instead of a resource consuming chemical rocket, what about a nuclear rocket instead? If there are any volatile materials within Phobos, they could be utilized as fuel. I seriously doubt the feasibilty of space elevators. Beside that, phobos could act as a way station for spacecraft coming to and from Mars. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 09:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
:Why are you in doubt about the feasibility of space elevators? I find it extremely useful (and simple!) if used only for landing on the Martian surface. I look forward to read your concerns in the article [[space elevator]] ;-) -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 07:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | :Why are you in doubt about the feasibility of space elevators? I find it extremely useful (and simple!) if used only for landing on the Martian surface. I look forward to read your concerns in the article [[space elevator]] ;-) -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 07:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | Why not simply re-oreintate Phobos to an aereostationry orbit, and use it as an anchor for the space elevator. [[User:T.Neo|T.Neo]] 12:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 04:32, 23 June 2008
Lost information
Although I like the recent change, I do not fully agree with it, because the following information got lost:
- time until phobos becomes a real threat
- obstacle for building a space elevator
- several technological approaches to lift Phobos into a higher orbit (I doubt the rocket technology is the best, for it consumes vast amounts of chemical fuels)
-- Rfc 06:17, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
Sorry, but rocket technology is pretty much all we have right now, but in response to that, instead of a resource consuming chemical rocket, what about a nuclear rocket instead? If there are any volatile materials within Phobos, they could be utilized as fuel. I seriously doubt the feasibilty of space elevators. Beside that, phobos could act as a way station for spacecraft coming to and from Mars. T.Neo 09:30, 18 June 2008 (UTC)
- Why are you in doubt about the feasibility of space elevators? I find it extremely useful (and simple!) if used only for landing on the Martian surface. I look forward to read your concerns in the article space elevator ;-) -- Rfc 07:24, 20 June 2008 (UTC)
Why not simply re-oreintate Phobos to an aereostationry orbit, and use it as an anchor for the space elevator. T.Neo 12:32, 23 June 2008 (UTC)
