Difference between revisions of "Talk:Phobos"
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) |
Jarogers2001 (talk | contribs) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| + | '''Administrative''' | ||
| + | |||
Articles "Phobos" and "Phobos Photos" merged by import procedure on this date. - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 08:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | Articles "Phobos" and "Phobos Photos" merged by import procedure on this date. - [[User:Jarogers2001|Jarogers2001]] 08:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | ==Discussion== | ||
Now there are at least two suggestions for the origin of the crater chains on Phobos that are more likely than the impact with Martian impact debris theory. We should not laugh at NASA's analysis. No explanations at all would be much worse. Praise NASA's courage and laugh with NASA. They can borrow the expanations offered here and the world will be better for a little less seriousness.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 00:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | Now there are at least two suggestions for the origin of the crater chains on Phobos that are more likely than the impact with Martian impact debris theory. We should not laugh at NASA's analysis. No explanations at all would be much worse. Praise NASA's courage and laugh with NASA. They can borrow the expanations offered here and the world will be better for a little less seriousness.--[[User:Farred|Farred]] 00:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC) | ||
Revision as of 00:28, 2 January 2009
Administrative
Articles "Phobos" and "Phobos Photos" merged by import procedure on this date. - Jarogers2001 08:26, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
Discussion
Now there are at least two suggestions for the origin of the crater chains on Phobos that are more likely than the impact with Martian impact debris theory. We should not laugh at NASA's analysis. No explanations at all would be much worse. Praise NASA's courage and laugh with NASA. They can borrow the expanations offered here and the world will be better for a little less seriousness.--Farred 00:12, 17 October 2008 (UTC)
