Difference between revisions of "Talk:Venus"
(→QeeMNDdbVnASVI: new section) |
|||
| Line 2: | Line 2: | ||
:I think we can do it on Mars, but I don't think we can do it on Venus. Without mining there is no way to build a growing autonomous colony, I'm afraid. At least with currently known technology. The asteroid belt or the moons of Jupiter might even be a better goal. In my opinion, if we can make it on Mars (and that's by no means a sure thing) we are ripe for further goals, and Venus is last on my list. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 22:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | :I think we can do it on Mars, but I don't think we can do it on Venus. Without mining there is no way to build a growing autonomous colony, I'm afraid. At least with currently known technology. The asteroid belt or the moons of Jupiter might even be a better goal. In my opinion, if we can make it on Mars (and that's by no means a sure thing) we are ripe for further goals, and Venus is last on my list. -- [[User:Rfc|Rfc]] 22:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC) | ||
| + | |||
| + | == QeeMNDdbVnASVI == | ||
| + | |||
| + | It's a pleausre to find someone who can think so clearly | ||
Revision as of 01:22, 4 December 2012
How about a "Venuspedia"? I am semi-joking. Settling the moon and mars is more practical, in my opinion. On the other hand, it would be fun to explore the possibilities.--Nate 19:38, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
- I think we can do it on Mars, but I don't think we can do it on Venus. Without mining there is no way to build a growing autonomous colony, I'm afraid. At least with currently known technology. The asteroid belt or the moons of Jupiter might even be a better goal. In my opinion, if we can make it on Mars (and that's by no means a sure thing) we are ripe for further goals, and Venus is last on my list. -- Rfc 22:19, 2 January 2009 (UTC)
QeeMNDdbVnASVI
It's a pleausre to find someone who can think so clearly
