Difference between revisions of "Solar Electric Propulsion"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
Line 2: Line 2:
 
Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) is a combination of solar power as an energy source, and electric propulsion as an drive engine.
 
Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) is a combination of solar power as an energy source, and electric propulsion as an drive engine.
  
SEP is more mass effective and cost effective compared to most Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) in the inner solar system. However, electric propulsion is not very interesting for crewed missions, due to the high mass requirements and long travel times.
+
SEP is more mass effective and cost effective compared to most Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) proposals for the inner solar system. However, electric propulsion is not very interesting for crewed missions, due to the high mass requirements and long travel times. Chemical propulsion has been used for most missions instead.
 +
SEP might be useful for cargo transfer to and from Mars, although the practical difficulty of landing materials carried by SEP make it less attractive.  Chemical propulsion vehicle are configured in such a way that they can carry out aerobraking, which can significantly reduce the deltaV requirements of an orbital transfer, while aerobraking is difficult to devise for SEP vehicles.
 +
 
  
 
[[Category:Propulsion]]
 
[[Category:Propulsion]]

Revision as of 08:52, 2 May 2024

Solar Electric Propulsion (SEP) is a combination of solar power as an energy source, and electric propulsion as an drive engine.

SEP is more mass effective and cost effective compared to most Nuclear Electric Propulsion (NEP) proposals for the inner solar system. However, electric propulsion is not very interesting for crewed missions, due to the high mass requirements and long travel times. Chemical propulsion has been used for most missions instead. SEP might be useful for cargo transfer to and from Mars, although the practical difficulty of landing materials carried by SEP make it less attractive. Chemical propulsion vehicle are configured in such a way that they can carry out aerobraking, which can significantly reduce the deltaV requirements of an orbital transfer, while aerobraking is difficult to devise for SEP vehicles.