Difference between revisions of "Funding"
(One intermediate revision by the same user not shown) | |||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | The '''money''' to pay for all [[financial effort estimation|costs]] may come from different sources. Since the costs for building a [[settlement]] on Mars are | + | The '''money''' to pay for all [[financial effort estimation|costs]] may come from different sources. Since the costs for building a [[settlement]] on Mars are likely to be high, a global '''funding''' may be a promising approach. The first human mission to Mars may be estimated at about 10 billion USD, but many other values have been proposed.(references needed) |
==Funding by Government== | ==Funding by Government== | ||
− | National space agencies, like [[NASA]], have several responsibilities. They are busy enough with orbital and scientific tasks. Extraterrestrial colonization is usually not in scope. | + | National space agencies, like [[NASA]], have several responsibilities. They are busy enough with orbital and scientific tasks. Extraterrestrial colonization is usually not in scope. China is the only other nation than the US that is likely to have a national space program that might involve colonization. |
==Private Investors== | ==Private Investors== | ||
− | There are | + | There are a small number of super-rich people on [[Earth]], whose money would suffice for a first step of Martian colonization. |
+ | The economical growth of the Earth economy (high GDP growth), through population growth and increases in efficiency, means that the pro-rata cost of developing Mars is getting to be a smaller and smaller portion of the Word economy. It may become the case that the development of a Martian settlement can be financed entirely by a single individual or economical entity, regardless of the actual return on investment. | ||
==Media Event== | ==Media Event== | ||
− | Generating money from global media events is the plan of [[Mars One]]. They want to generate 6 billion USD during a period of 10 years. Compared with the Olympic games, which generated about 3 billion USD within two weeks, this sounds promising. | + | Generating money from global media events is the plan of [[Mars One]]. They want to generate 6 billion USD during a period of 10 years. Compared with the Olympic games, which generated about 3 billion USD within two weeks, this sounds promising. However, Mars One failed and ceased operating in 2019. |
==Crowdfunding== | ==Crowdfunding== | ||
Line 25: | Line 26: | ||
==Corporate and institutional Investors== | ==Corporate and institutional Investors== | ||
− | Investment is a question of supply and demand. If there is significant demand for a | + | Investment is a question of supply and demand. If there is significant demand for a Martian settlement as a living space, then there can be investment, return on investment, speculation and all the standard items of investment. If a Martian settlement can provide a reasonable business plan, with provable growth potential, and in particular a period of exponential growth, then it will attract corporate investment, that can be considered as the sum of the interest of any number of mid-sized investors. The question then becomes how much money would interested people be willing to pay to move to Mars, and how much might they pay to stay there. How much can costs be reduced by government involvement in research and infrastructure costs, and can the voting public be convinced to support such investments? An important point to make would be the jobs created on Earth by a Martian settlement. After all, most of the goods and services would come from Earth for quite some time. |
+ | |||
+ | At any time in the future the perception of an existential threat to humanity and the possibility of mitigation by the development of a autonomous settlement on Mars might become a priority. Alternatively, space settlements may provide competition to this idea, in particular if living on the surface of Mars does not provide enough advantages. | ||
+ | |||
+ | It is unlikely that the mineral resources of Mars can become valuable enough to finance a settlement of Mars. After all, the Earth provides a similar environment at far lower cost. However, if a significant space economy is developed, Mars might service that space economy at lower cost than from Earth. Despite this, Fly in fly out operations might make an actual permanent presence on the surface of Mars redundant. | ||
+ | |||
[[Category: Commerce and Economics]] | [[Category: Commerce and Economics]] |
Latest revision as of 12:51, 24 February 2022
The money to pay for all costs may come from different sources. Since the costs for building a settlement on Mars are likely to be high, a global funding may be a promising approach. The first human mission to Mars may be estimated at about 10 billion USD, but many other values have been proposed.(references needed)
Contents
Funding by Government
National space agencies, like NASA, have several responsibilities. They are busy enough with orbital and scientific tasks. Extraterrestrial colonization is usually not in scope. China is the only other nation than the US that is likely to have a national space program that might involve colonization.
Private Investors
There are a small number of super-rich people on Earth, whose money would suffice for a first step of Martian colonization. The economical growth of the Earth economy (high GDP growth), through population growth and increases in efficiency, means that the pro-rata cost of developing Mars is getting to be a smaller and smaller portion of the Word economy. It may become the case that the development of a Martian settlement can be financed entirely by a single individual or economical entity, regardless of the actual return on investment.
Media Event
Generating money from global media events is the plan of Mars One. They want to generate 6 billion USD during a period of 10 years. Compared with the Olympic games, which generated about 3 billion USD within two weeks, this sounds promising. However, Mars One failed and ceased operating in 2019.
Crowdfunding
Donations by many people around the world may result in vast amounts of money. But most people are sceptic about the outcome of the project. A person may donate 100 USD to support the project, but can not be sure that this donation really leads to the wanted landing on Mars. If the financing is not sufficient, the project will fail. So, the donor has spent the money for nothing.
What if the success could be guaranteed? How much would the same donor pay, if he can be absolutely sure that the money will have the wanted effect, that the colonization comes true? Would he pay ten times as much, e.g. 1000 USD? The following crowdfunding model could provide such a guaranty.
Secured Donations with Guaranty
At the beginning of the project the donor signs a contract with the colonizing organization, in which he obligates himself to pay a certain amount, e.g. 1000 USD, as soon as the colony on Mars is established and the settlers have arrived there. If the project succeeds, the donor must pay. If the project fails, the donor does not need to pay.
This funding model can be compared with buying a car with a deferred payment (say 6 month) and a warranty of 6 month. When the car is still fine after the 6 months have elapsed, you have to pay it, else you give the car back and don't pay.
For funding a Martian colonization project the model will include many contracts with donors from all around the world, which sums up to a large amount. If the sum is published on a daily basis, everyone can watch how far the financial costs are covered. Media companies may serve as very potent donors, if they get the rights to broadcast the live events on TV according to the amount of their donations. Sooner or later the sum covers the whole project. This is the moment the project can start. Until then, no money at all is really available, but the prospect of a success becomes palpable, at least from the financial aspect. Now the organization must convince potential investors that they are technically able to do the colonization. The investors give the real money and the rockets and all the other stuff can be made. The colony is built, the settlers go to Mars. Finally, the investors get a return of their investment from the contracts of the donors, but only if the project succeeds. The donors give the money, but the investors take the risk. Surely, the investors will carefully supervise the organization to protect their investment.
The deferred payment contracts are only one possibility. An alternative is the setup of an interest-bearing escrow deposit or a blocked account. Finally, depending on the outcome of the project, the stored money goes back to the donors or to the investors.
Corporate and institutional Investors
Investment is a question of supply and demand. If there is significant demand for a Martian settlement as a living space, then there can be investment, return on investment, speculation and all the standard items of investment. If a Martian settlement can provide a reasonable business plan, with provable growth potential, and in particular a period of exponential growth, then it will attract corporate investment, that can be considered as the sum of the interest of any number of mid-sized investors. The question then becomes how much money would interested people be willing to pay to move to Mars, and how much might they pay to stay there. How much can costs be reduced by government involvement in research and infrastructure costs, and can the voting public be convinced to support such investments? An important point to make would be the jobs created on Earth by a Martian settlement. After all, most of the goods and services would come from Earth for quite some time.
At any time in the future the perception of an existential threat to humanity and the possibility of mitigation by the development of a autonomous settlement on Mars might become a priority. Alternatively, space settlements may provide competition to this idea, in particular if living on the surface of Mars does not provide enough advantages.
It is unlikely that the mineral resources of Mars can become valuable enough to finance a settlement of Mars. After all, the Earth provides a similar environment at far lower cost. However, if a significant space economy is developed, Mars might service that space economy at lower cost than from Earth. Despite this, Fly in fly out operations might make an actual permanent presence on the surface of Mars redundant.