Difference between revisions of "One-Way Human Settlement Projects"

From Marspedia
Jump to: navigation, search
m (links corrected)
(Why do a manned one-way mission?)
Line 1: Line 1:
Instead of bringing a crew to [[Mars]] and getting them back after several months with huge effort and [[financial effort estimation|cost]], it is much cheaper to perform a '''Manned One-way Mission''' with the same technological and scientific results. The crew stays on Mars without any planned return concept. There are several possible aims:
+
Instead of bringing a crew to [[Mars]] and getting them back after several months, a '''manned one-way mission''' is considered. The crew stays on Mars without any planned return concept.
  
==[[Mission with planned death]]==  
+
==Why do a manned one-way mission?==
 +
* Building a permanent Martian settlement is the actual aim to reach. Planning and performing a return mission does not bring us much further to reach this aim and is, therefore, a waste of time.
 +
* The [[financial effort estimation|effort]] of the preparation of a return vehicle is high. A one-way mission is much cheaper and yields the same technological and scientific results. If the saved effort is spent to build a comfortable long term settlement, the technological and scientific results are much higher.
 +
* The health risk of extended space travel is high. Due to inertia constraints the shielding of a space ship is only partially possible.
 +
 
 +
==Possible scenarios==
 +
 
 +
===[[Mission with planned death]]===
 
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies ([[food]], [[oxygen]], etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. When they run out of supplies they die and the mission is over. There are plenty of [[volunteer]]s for such a mission, for it is a great honour to be the first on Mars.  
 
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies ([[food]], [[oxygen]], etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. When they run out of supplies they die and the mission is over. There are plenty of [[volunteer]]s for such a mission, for it is a great honour to be the first on Mars.  
  
==Foundation of an [[Earth-supported colony]]==  
+
===Foundation of an [[Earth-supported colony]]===
 
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. Early before they run out of supplies they receive replenishment from earth. A constant logistic maintains the colony indefinitely.  
 
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. Early before they run out of supplies they receive replenishment from earth. A constant logistic maintains the colony indefinitely.  
  
==Foundation of an [[autonomous colony]]==  
+
===Foundation of an [[autonomous colony]]===
 
People are brought to Mars not before a basic artificial [[habitat]] with [[house]]s, supplies and [[equipment for autonomous growth|equipment]] for a long term stay has deposited on Mars' surface. The equipment is technologically sufficient to allow the settlers to grow their own food, extend their [[settlement]] etc.
 
People are brought to Mars not before a basic artificial [[habitat]] with [[house]]s, supplies and [[equipment for autonomous growth|equipment]] for a long term stay has deposited on Mars' surface. The equipment is technologically sufficient to allow the settlers to grow their own food, extend their [[settlement]] etc.
  

Revision as of 04:44, 22 June 2009

Instead of bringing a crew to Mars and getting them back after several months, a manned one-way mission is considered. The crew stays on Mars without any planned return concept.

Why do a manned one-way mission?

  • Building a permanent Martian settlement is the actual aim to reach. Planning and performing a return mission does not bring us much further to reach this aim and is, therefore, a waste of time.
  • The effort of the preparation of a return vehicle is high. A one-way mission is much cheaper and yields the same technological and scientific results. If the saved effort is spent to build a comfortable long term settlement, the technological and scientific results are much higher.
  • The health risk of extended space travel is high. Due to inertia constraints the shielding of a space ship is only partially possible.

Possible scenarios

Mission with planned death

The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. When they run out of supplies they die and the mission is over. There are plenty of volunteers for such a mission, for it is a great honour to be the first on Mars.

Foundation of an Earth-supported colony

The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. Early before they run out of supplies they receive replenishment from earth. A constant logistic maintains the colony indefinitely.

Foundation of an autonomous colony

People are brought to Mars not before a basic artificial habitat with houses, supplies and equipment for a long term stay has deposited on Mars' surface. The equipment is technologically sufficient to allow the settlers to grow their own food, extend their settlement etc.

See Also

v · d · eManned Missions to Mars

Concepts: Greenhouse · Settlements · Locations · General
Hazards: Space Weather · Climate · General
Technology: Hi-Tech · Lo-Tech · Energy · Spaceflight science · Communication · General
Human Considerations: Economics · Health · Governance · Trade · Law · Social