Difference between revisions of "One-Way Human Settlement Projects"
m (→Foundation of an autonomous colony: grammar) |
(→Why do a manned one-way mission?: bone atrophy) |
||
Line 4: | Line 4: | ||
* Building a permanent Martian settlement is the actual aim to reach. Planning and performing a return mission does not bring us much further to reach this aim and is, therefore, a waste of time. | * Building a permanent Martian settlement is the actual aim to reach. Planning and performing a return mission does not bring us much further to reach this aim and is, therefore, a waste of time. | ||
* The [[costs]] of the preparation of a return vehicle is high. A one-way mission is much cheaper and yields the same technological and scientific results. If the saved effort is spent to build a comfortable long term settlement, the technological and scientific results are much higher. | * The [[costs]] of the preparation of a return vehicle is high. A one-way mission is much cheaper and yields the same technological and scientific results. If the saved effort is spent to build a comfortable long term settlement, the technological and scientific results are much higher. | ||
− | * The health risk of extended space travel is high. Due to inertia constraints the shielding of a space ship is only partially possible. | + | * The health risk of extended space travel is high. Due to inertia constraints the shielding of a space ship against [[radiation]] is only partially possible, which increases the probability for cancer tremendously. A one-way trip poses only half the risk of a return mission. |
+ | * Bone atrophy is inevitable in space with current medical knowledge. After a return mission of estimated [[Mars-500|520 days]] the astronauts would surely suffer a lot from the strong terrestrial [[gravity]]. A one-way trip takes less than 250 days. The longest space trip up to now was 439 days by Waleri Poljakow. | ||
==Possible scenarios== | ==Possible scenarios== |
Revision as of 12:38, 21 November 2010
Instead of bringing a crew to Mars and getting them back after several months, a manned one-way mission is considered. The crew stays on Mars without any planned return concept.
Contents
Why do a manned one-way mission?
- Building a permanent Martian settlement is the actual aim to reach. Planning and performing a return mission does not bring us much further to reach this aim and is, therefore, a waste of time.
- The costs of the preparation of a return vehicle is high. A one-way mission is much cheaper and yields the same technological and scientific results. If the saved effort is spent to build a comfortable long term settlement, the technological and scientific results are much higher.
- The health risk of extended space travel is high. Due to inertia constraints the shielding of a space ship against radiation is only partially possible, which increases the probability for cancer tremendously. A one-way trip poses only half the risk of a return mission.
- Bone atrophy is inevitable in space with current medical knowledge. After a return mission of estimated 520 days the astronauts would surely suffer a lot from the strong terrestrial gravity. A one-way trip takes less than 250 days. The longest space trip up to now was 439 days by Waleri Poljakow.
Possible scenarios
Mission with planned death
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. When they run out of supplies they die and the mission is over. There are plenty of volunteers for such a mission, for it is a great honour to be the first on Mars.
Foundation of an Earth-supported colony
The crew is brought to Mars with a certain amount of supplies (food, oxygen, etc.) that lasts, let's say, a year. Early before they run out of supplies they receive replenishment from earth. A constant logistic maintains the colony indefinitely.
Foundation of an autonomous colony
People are brought to Mars not before a basic artificial habitat with houses, supplies and equipment for a long term stay has been deposited on Mars' surface. The equipment is technologically sufficient to allow the settlers to grow their own food, extend their settlement etc.
See Also
Concepts: | Greenhouse · Settlements · Locations · General |
Hazards: | Space Weather · Climate · General |
Technology: | Hi-Tech · Lo-Tech · Energy · Spaceflight science · Communication · General |
Human Considerations: | Economics · Health · Governance · Trade · Law · Social |